If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I have just modified one external link on Eye of the Beholder (video game). I have these portraits, but I don't know what if anything, I could do with them in regards to this wiki. The second is more along the lines of a bit of trivia, a number of the portraits in Eye of the Behold were Westwood employees: Paul Mudra, Phil Gorrow, Joseph Hewitt (myself), Mike Legg, Frank Saxxon, Aaron Powell and Eydie Laramore. However, the intent was for the players to lure / push him into the spike trap where there was additional animation of him getting impaled on the spikes, remember this was back in the MS-Dos days and there wasn't room for a whole other animated sequence without adding another disk. This took quite some time, but it easily do-able and how most people killed him. Because of the EoB Two-step, the name we gave to the way players would quickly sidestep, turn and sidestep again to keep getting hits on the monsters without risk of taking much damage, they were able to kill Xanathar, the Beholder, with normal attack and damage. There is more to ending in the original game that most players were aware. I have some additional information that I didn't feel comfortable writing into the main entry. I believe Westwood is thanked in the credits. Westwood did help in the creation of the third game though via code, asserts and advice were still shared. Westwood was acquired by Virgin in 1992, that is why they didn't create the third game. I changed the bit about 'creative differences' with SSI as being the reason Westwood didn't do the third installment of the game. Katana Geldar 01:11, (UTC) -Preceding unsigned comment added by Katana Geldar ( talk What about a section on how it relates to Dungeons and Dragons? Many of the things in this game (races, classes, alignment, monsters, spells etc) are taken directly from Advanced D&D, but there's no real mention of this. Not having the game handy, I can't completely confirm the spelling of Acwellan (basically my hand-writing on old maps is unclear enough as to cast slight doubt on the e and the latter a in the name), but the following walkthough link confirms my spelling here (as well as identifying the lich as named Acwellan) : Eye of the Beholder III Solution by Alex van Kaam (Part 4)Ĩ5.224.19.18 ( talk) 16:28, 23 April 2008 (UTC) Reply Possibly User:Doommaster1994 was somehow confusing the lich name with a Temple of Lathander in Myth Drannor which the player can enter in the game. Lathander is the MorningLord, a deity of good, opposed to undead creatures such as Liches. Having played the game, and knowing a few things about Forgotten Realms, the name of the lich is most certainly not Lathander. In subsection for Eye of the Beholder III: Assault on Myth Drannor :Ĭhanged the name of the lich from Lathander to Acwellan. Is there something like that out there in development for EOB? Because that would be hot. I understand there's a project out there to remake the old Gold Box style games using a new version of Unlimited Adventures called Dungeon Craft. Allowed you to keep "ultimate weapons" like the Golden Halbeard! One crowning feature I remember from EOB was the ability to import your saved characters (and equipment) from EOB1 -> EOB2 and then EOB3. This page could do with a couple of screenshots too. JamesTheNumberless 15:46, 2 January 2007 (UTC) Reply I think the sequels should definitely get their own pages. The notability and significance of the series as a whole only really requires one article but there should definitely be more information on the second game as it was indeed the hilight of the trilogy. I'm not convinced there's enough, besides merely plot elements, that's significantly different in the sequels. I want to know if you guys think the sequels should get their own pages. I have removed the story information for EOB2 for now. This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Referencing and citation: criterion not met.This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help! Dungeons & Dragons Wikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons Template:WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons Dungeons & Dragons articles This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. Dungeons & Dragons C‑class Low‑importance
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |